eiffel tower top: all the truth.

Serero_detail_ETDNA_600X400.jpg

After the big tide of information and missinformation about the controvertial design for the Eiffel´s tower new top, we decided to look for the real stuff, so in collaboration with my friend reporter Marcus Hurst we contacted with david serero the principal at serero architects, wich gave us this exclusive interview for edgargonzalez.com:

EG.com: How did this idea come about? Did you envisage this sort of attention when you posted this project on the internet?

David Serero: I have been doing for the last 4 years research on generation and fabrication of variable structural components. After almost 10 years working in the USA, Italy and Spain, I came back to Paris about 2 years ago. I rediscovered the Eiffel tower has I was showing it to my son for the first time. I was surprised when I realize that the Eiffel Tower was already using standardized three-dimensional structural beams which were assembled using variable geometric shape ( in order to fit the changing section of the tower). The tower has been since then a reference and a source of discussion for our projects.

We had no idea that proposing such a project would create such excitement and reactions from Parisians and people around the world. The interest raised by our project is not linked to the notion of structural performance or to the simple fact that it is related to a national monument. I believed that its interest rather resides in its relationship to the existing structure, on its deep intertwining with the existing structure. The platform does not operate on the mode of the addition, but rather on the mode of the mutation, on the one of the growth of the existing structure. Our platform unfolds with the same formal freedom, the same uselessness and gratuity of the Eiffel tower itself. Like the tower our proposal is bother hideous and beautiful, completely out of place and precisely integrated.

 

 

EG.com: Some have celebrated this action as an example of PR genius, whereas others have been highly critical of your actions. Don’t you fear that this could hurt serero architects credibility?

David Serero:Our firm is known for the quality of its work ( Selection to the Venice Biennale , 2004 Rome Prize winner). We have a very different approach to architecture than most of the offices based in Paris. It is important to us to use these differences to (re)activate a critical debate about architecture and its role in society, as this debate is cruelly missing.

As confirm by a note on our website on March 31th , our project for a the temporary extension of the Eiffel tower is an unsolicited proposal to the Eiffel Tower management company. We are confirming that the SETE did not organized a competition on this topic, in contrary with what was announced in the press. This project has been a victim of disinformation ( notably by the article published in The Guardian) which contributed to discredit our proposal. Some blogs and daily newspapers did present wrongly the project as the winner of a competition organized and approved by the Société d’exploitation de la Tour Eiffel. We did actively ask journalists who contacted us to correct this information.

 

EG.com:A spokesman for serero architects informed the Belfast telegraph that your firm had been “invited to enter a limited competition” regarding your proposals, can you confirm that this is true?

David Serero: This is not true, we did contact last week the Belfast Telegraph to ask them to correct immediately their article. They did try to contact us but no one who worked on this project was available to answer their questions. They finally asked them to a foreign intern who just arrived to the office, who simply repeated what he read in the Guardian. This person was far from being aSpokesman for Serero Architects.


 

EG.com:You recently informed The New York Times that this is not the first time your firm has posted unsolicited designs on the internet. Can you give us some examples of previous cases of this?

David Serero: Yes, the MQB furniture, is a furniture design collection that we proposed to the Quai Branly Museum. Due to the fabrication complexity of such pieces the Museum decided to refuse this proposal. The Art Arena, was an unsolicited proposal to the Roland Collection. They approved the project and worked on it for 2 years before major site problems revealed and stopped the project. Our research projects often start from proposal that we want to make.

 

 

EG.com:The ease by which respected news sources have picked up on this story without doing any meticulous fact checking has highlighted the power of misinformation on the internet. Is this a reflection of declining standards in journalism nowadays?

David Serero: What really striked me is the manner information, was more accurately transmitted by the internet media ( such as blogs) in opposition with the written press who did a really bad job. I believed that the crisis that the press media is facing today ( freenewspaper competition, all the new support of information ) is unfortunately putting a stress of them and make them more dependant of readers. They need create surprises and to announce “scoop” news. We are effectively in a paradoxical moment, where a network of highly independent entities ( such as blogs) are more reactive and precise than huge media groups.

 

Many thanks to David Serero for giving and Marcus Hurst for conducting the interview.

Editor en Jefe de edgargonzalez.com.. Profesor / conferenciante en varias universidades. y Consultor de tendencias e innovación en la intersección entre la arquitectura/diseño, tecnología y difusión desde EGD (Edgar Gonzalez Design).

Es mexicano, arquitecto e iconoclasta de vez en cuando, aunque no necesariamente en ese orden.

30 thoughts on “eiffel tower top: all the truth.

  1. andres

    Un hit la entrevista. En época de hoax, bulos, esto es como entrevistar a Steve acerca de un mac-rumor…jeje…. muy bueno…

  2. Braulio Agnese

    Mr. Serero neglects to mention that in an e-mail exchange with an Architect magazine reporter about the "project" he made several statements confirming our inquiry of whether there was a competition and that Serero Architects' proposal would become a reality. I offer an edited version here:

    ++++++++++++++

    From: david serero [serero@serero.com]

    Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:27 PM

    To: Miller, Stephani

    Subject: RE: Eiffel Tower temporary platform extension

    Stephani Miller,

    We sent you this week a cdrom with all the pictures for the Eiffel project. You should receive it in the coming days.

    Concerning your questions :

    1. Was there a competition for the design of a platform extension?

    There was an open call to architects to restructure the public spaces of the Eiffel Tower. The sociíˆtíˆ dí­Exploitation de la tour Eiffel aimed to give better accessibility and better reception. Our project focused on the idea to increase the top floor surface area.

    [snip]

    3. When was the winning design chosen?

    Our project has been selected with the condition to verify its technical feasibility. In the next 2 months, we will be able to get a definite answer

    4. Who judged the design submissions?

    I do not know exactly the name of the judges

    [snip]

    6. When will the platform extension be installed?

    We are expected to install it in the spring 2009 for a period of one year.

    [snip]

    Regards,

    David Serero

    ++++++++++++++

    In addition, the e-mail we received from Louis Wapler (press@serero.com) contained this sentence: "The structure is expected to be assembled for the 120th anniversary of the tower construction." And a PDF attachment to the e-mail explaining the proposal says this: "In celebration of the 120th birthday of the tower, the Societé d'Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel launched an open call for architects to restructure the public reception and access areas of the tower."

    The original article and follow-up may be found here: https://www.architectmagazine.com/industry-news.as

    Our reporter contacted Serero's office once we learned that in fact no competition had occurred, but no response was ever received.

    Architect magazine was remiss to run our story without confirmation from SETE, but that does not change what Mr. Serero wrote and what was contained in the e-mail and PDF sent to us by Wapler.

    I would be happy to forward the e-mails and PDF to anyone who is interested.

    Braulio Agnese

    Associate Editor

    Architect

  3. Pingback: The Art of the Prank » Blog Archive » Eiffel Tower Being Redesigned?

  4. cdk

    very learnful, mr Agnese. In fact, on their website, still the phrase 'The project will (!, ed.) extend the top floor plate of the tower by grafting a high performance carbon Kevlar structure on it. The structure will be temporarily bolted to the slab without requiring any modification of the existing structure. It will (!, ed.) expand the usable floor area from 280 m2 to 580m2.'

    So, it's clear who's, still, lying here.

    I don't know how these people still could disrespect the simple fact of this plan NOT becoming reality. Respecting facts is a valuable thing.

  5. Pingback: ultimate team coins

  6. Pingback: free fifa 15 coins

  7. Pingback: cheap fifa 15 coins

  8. Pingback: fifa coins

  9. Pingback: https://amkpanoramacondo.com

  10. Pingback: warehouses for sale

  11. Pingback: fifa conis buy

  12. Pingback: office space Miami

  13. Pingback: www.phillyslipandfalllawyer.com

  14. Pingback: hotel brokers

  15. Pingback: desktop computer

  16. Pingback: https://quickquotelandscaping.com

  17. Pingback: warehouse

  18. Pingback: green roofs, green roof, living roofs, living roof, sedum roof, sedum roofs, bio diverse roof, bio diverse roofs, brown roofs, green roofs uk, green roof uk, brown roof

  19. Pingback: pest control estimate

  20. Pingback: office space

  21. Pingback: get more

  22. Pingback: White Oak Landscape

  23. Pingback: BinaryBankBreaker

  24. Pingback: www.botaniqueatbartleyuol.com

  25. Pingback: london mouse control

  26. Pingback: security cameras tampa

  27. Pingback: ir35 legislation

  28. Pingback: painters

  29. Pingback: binary boom

  30. Pingback: blogging

Comments are closed